| |
Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 3 No. 1
February 2002

Editorial: Role of the
Natural Hazards and Disaster Field in the Aftermath of September 11
Estimating
Watershed Level Flood Damage in the Red River Valley of the North
Steven D. Shultz and
Michael E. Kjelland
Abstract: Flood damage estimates for
two sub-watersheds of the Red River Valley were found to be deficient in terms of
availability, accuracy, and geographic detail. Data manipulation strategies
were used to improve the quality of flood damage estimates in the two
watersheds between 1989 and 1998. Extrapolating previous agricultural flood
damage estimates for specific years based on hydrologic data increased such
estimates by 340% in the Maple Watershed, North Dakota and
by 200% in the Wild Rice Watershed, Minnesota. Conversely,
identifying the township location of nonagricultural flood damage payments by
FEMA along with a simple population based adjustment of other county level
nonagricultural damage in each watershed, reduced nonagricultural flood damage
estimates by 80% in the Maple Watershed and by 27% in the Wild Rice Watershed.
It is recommended that disaster relief agencies increase the geographical
specificity of their damage payment data. Until then, the data manipulation
procedures of this present study have the potential to improve the temporal and
spatial accuracy of watershed level flood damage estimates.
Emerging
Hurricane Evacuation Issues: Hurricane Floyd and South Carolina
Kirstin Dow and Susan L. Cutter
Abstract: A survey of coastal South Carolina residents
addressed the role of household decisions in amplifying demand on transportation
infrastructure during 1999’s Hurricane Floyd evacuation. The evacuation rate
averaged 65% (64.2%) in coastal evacuation areas. Three major findings
reveal that traffic problems are becoming a major consideration in whether
people evacuate. How they evacuate is emerging as an issue for evacuation
traffic planning. First, about 25% of households took two or more cars. Nearly
50% of evacuees left in one 6-h period. Major traffic pressure developed on the
Interstate system, particularly Interstate-26. Second, while the majority of
respondents carried road maps, only 51% of that group used them to determine
their route. Many decided to stay on the Interstate despite the congestion.
Finally, the majority of South Carolinian residents traveled distances greater
than necessary for safe sheltering and more than in past hurricanes.
Transportation issues will become more important in coastal evacuations as
traffic problems impinge on peoples’ ability to get out of harm’s way and
ultimately influence their decisions to evacuate.
Disaster Management System for Southwestern Indiana
Nasim Uddin, P.E., and Dennis Engi
Abstract: The Southwest Indiana Disaster Resistant Community
Corporation (SWIDRCC!) and Sandia National Laboratories formed a partnership in
1999 with the intent of developing and deploying a system that will
significantly lessen the loss of human life and lower the cost of disaster
recovery in a five-county region. Although this region currently has a response
system in place that appears adequate to meet the challenges posed by a
disaster, the partnership is considering substantial improvements that could
significantly lessen the cost of disasters. As a result of the SWIDRCC-Sandia
partnership, a policy portfolio for the SWIDRCC has been developed and a
significant technology development activity has been structured using the
virtual issue process (VIP). VIP is a strategic planning tool developed by
Sandia to provide concise information from a community or group that can be
used to resolve complex issues and problems. The disaster management system
that was defined as the result of the VIP will integrate sensor technologies,
modeling and simulation tools, telemetry systems, and computing platforms, in
addition to non-automated elements including increased community education and
involvement. The system is expected to provide information (pre-event,
during event, and in event recovery) to community leaders that will
significantly enhance the ability of the community to manage disaster response.
The value of the system will be manifest in both reducing the loss of human
life and staying the economic well-being of the community. It is expected
that the system will serve as a prototype for other communities throughout the
country. To aid in system definition during the process, two dynamic simulation
models were also developed: the policy portfolio analysis tool and the
infrastructure modeling tool.

| |
|